Re: [PATCH] likely cleanup: revert unlikely in ll_back_merge_fn

On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 07:20 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> But blk_recount_segments() sets the BIO_SEG_VALID flag. Ugh ok
> __bio_add_page() basically kills the flag. James, I think you are the
> author of that addition, does it really need to be so restrictive?
> 
>         /* If we may be able to merge these biovecs, force a recount */
>         if (bio->bi_vcnt && (BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(bvec-1, bvec) ||
>             BIOVEC_VIRT_MERGEABLE(bvec-1, bvec)))
>                 bio->bi_flags &= ~(1 << BIO_SEG_VALID);

Help me out here ... I can't find this chunk of code in the current
tree.  Where is it?

James


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] likely cleanup: revert unlikely in ll_back_merge_fn
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] likely cleanup: revert unlikely in ll_back_merge_fn
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • RE: [PATCH] likely cleanup: revert unlikely in ll_back_merge_fn
    • From: "Hua Zhong" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] likely cleanup: revert unlikely in ll_back_merge_fn
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: how to use the new wait functions in wait.c?
• Next by Date: [PATCH] i386: apic= command line option should always be honored
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] likely cleanup: revert unlikely in ll_back_merge_fn
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] likely cleanup: revert unlikely in ll_back_merge_fn
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]