On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 04:09:01PM +1200, Sam Vilain wrote: > Eric has said that his understanding was that syscall switches (ie, > syscalls with subcommands) were bad form. It's not just Eric, it's common sense and pretty broad consensus. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/5] uts namespaces: Introduction
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 0/5] uts namespaces: Introduction
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] change gen_pool allocator to not touch managed memory
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 001/001] INPUT: new ioctl's to retrieve values of EV_REP and EV_SND event codes
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- Index(es):
 |