RE: Problems with EDAC coexisting with BIOS

["Gross, Mark" <mark.gross@intel.com>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Corey Minyard [mailto:minyard@acm.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 7:19 PM
>To: Gross, Mark
>Cc: Alan Cox; bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; LKML; Carbonari,
>Steven; Ong, Soo Keong; Wang, Zhenyu Z
>Subject: Re: Problems with EDAC coexisting with BIOS
>
>Gross, Mark wrote:
>
>>>Yes, this is what I was talking about.  I believe the mode of
>>>module_param should be 444, since modifying this after the module is
>>>loaded won't do anything.  Also, it might be nice to print something
>>>different in the "force" case.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>How about printing nothing like it used too?
>>
>>See attached.
>>
>>
>This is fine with me.  I debated between printing nothing and a "You
>have chosen to override ..." print but didn't come out with any
>opinion.  I'm easy either way.
>
>The indenting in the "if (!force_function_unhide && !(stat8 & (1 <<
5)))
>{" clause is kind of strange 

I know I'm going to regret this but:  What's strange about it?

> and you have some spaces instead of tabs
>right after that (where stat8 is set).

Damn.  I pasted using the x-windows middle mouse button :(  I'll redo
the patch when I get back to my workstation tomorrow.

--mgross
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/