Re: [PATCH 1/4] Revert "[fuse] fix deadlock between fuse_put_super() and request_end()"

On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
> This reverts 73ce8355c243a434524a34c05cc417dd0467996e commit.

Btw, I _really_ hate commit messages that just say "this reverts that".

Please please _please_ say why it gets reverted, even if it's just a short 
explanation of what was wrong, and what the right thing is.

And if you have an old version of git that doesn't even start up an editor 
to allow you to talk about why the revert happens (yeah, that was a 
mistake), please do upgrade.

Trust me, you'll find a lot of the other improvements to your liking too.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [git patch] fuse fixes
  - From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/4] Revert "[fuse] fix deadlock between fuse_put_super() and request_end()"
  - From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] off-by-1 in kernel/power/main.c
Next by Date: Re: [patch] pciehp: dont call pci_enable_dev
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/4] Revert "[fuse] fix deadlock between fuse_put_super() and request_end()"
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/4] [fuse] fix deadlock between fuse_put_super() and request_end()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]