On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 2) Unrelated to this patch: If the _code_ section is never reallocated
> > or reused, what is the purpose of putting _code_ in the init section ?
> > Only to make sure that the init calls are called in order ?
>
> No, the code section is re-used, it's just never re-used for any other
> code (since we don't generate code on the fly). So if you pass in a
> function pointer, you know that if it's in the init section, it means that
> init-code that was discarded.
What about loadable modules? Is their code never loaded into memory that
used to be part of an init section?
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]