Re: C++ pushback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 	Hahaha. So now, it's not good enough that they not ask you to do anything,
> they have to actively *prevent* you from choosing to waste time on their
> changes?

If you wish to interpret it that way, I won't prevent you :-)

Anyway -- what I meant is that even if somebody writes a patch changing
names to avoid collisions with C++, _merging_ such a patch could be
easily a waste of other people's time, especially when there is no
other advantage in merging such a patch (like if the reason is that
somebody wishes to port his closed-source driver to Linux [*]).

[*]: Not that I'm claiming that this is the case now, but it already
happened.

				Have a nice fortnight
-- 
Martin `MJ' Mares   <[email protected]>   http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
First law of socio-genetics: Celibacy is not hereditary.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux