On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 11:48 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 02:50:57PM +0800, Yu, Luming wrote:
>
> > - for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
> > + for (i = 15; i >= 0 ; i--)
>
> We certainly need to do /something/ here, but I'm not sure this is it.
> Adam Belay has code to limit PCI state restoration to the PCI-specified
> registers, with the idea being that individual drivers fix things up
> properly. While this has the obvious drawback that almost every PCI
> driver in the tree would then need fixing up, it's also probably the
> right thing.
it has a second drawback: it assumes all devices HAVE a driver, which
isn't normally the case...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
