Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 06:03:23PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
...
> 
> Sorry it has taken such a long time to get round to looking into this
> problem. Can you see if the attached patch helps in any way?

No problem.

I will test the patch 'as soon as possible', hopefully today -
unfortunately the test machine is now in pretty heavy use but I should
be able to reproduce the problem and test the patch on another system.

Will let you know.

Thanks,

-- 

 / jakob

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
    • From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
    • From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
    • From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] raid6_end_write_request() spinlock fix
• Next by Date: Re: Lock-up with modprobe sdhci after suspending to ram
• Previous by thread: Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
• Next by thread: [PATCH 02/02 -rt] Include an interval timer for timeofday_periodic_hook
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]