Re: [PATCH 05/16] GFS2: File and inode operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Apr 24, 2006  14:53 +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 01:55 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > +++ b/include/linux/iflags.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
> > > +#define IFLAG_TOPDIR		__IFL(TopDir)		/* 0x00020000 */
> > > +#define IFLAG_DIRECTIO		__IFL(DirectIO)		/* 0x00040000 */
> > > +#define IFLAG_INHERITDIRECTIO	__IFL(InheritDirectIO)	/* 0x00080000 */
> > > +#define IFLAG_INHERITJDATA	__IFL(InheritJdata)	/* 0x00100000 */
> > > +#define IFLAG_RESERVED		__IFL(Reserved)		/* 0x80000000 */
> > 
> > Actually, the 0x0080000 flag has been reserved by e2fsprogs for ext3
> > extents for a while already.  AFAICS, there are no other flags in the
> > current e2fsprogs that aren't listed above.
>
> So if I call that one IFLAG_EXTENT, then I presume that will be ok?
> What about the 0x00040000 flag? That would seem to be a gap in the
> sequence (ignoring GFS flags for now), so should I leave that reserved
> for use by ext2/3 as well?

To be honest, I don't know if 0x40000 is used or not.  It isn't in the
e2fsprogs version of ext2_fs.h.

> > The other tidbit is that new ext2/ext3 files generally inherit the flags
> > from their parent directory, so it isn't clear if there is really a need
> > for a distinction between DIRECTIO and INHERIT_DIRECTIO, and similarly
> > JDATA and INHERIT_JDATA?  Generally, I'd think that JDATA isn't meaningful
> > on directories (since they are metadata and journaled anyways), nor is
> > DIRECTIO so their only meaning on a directory is "INHERIT for new files".
> 
> Yes, that sounds like a good plan. The only downside (purely from a GFS2
> point of view, it won't affect anybody else) means that its no longer a
> 1:1 relationship between flags, so in order to do the conversion, I'd
> have to use something a little more elaborate than the inline function I
> added to the iflags.h header file,

Hmm, maybe I don't understand the GFS2 issue then?  Why not just use
IFLAG_JDATA on the directory and remove the use of IFLAG_INHERITJDATA
(equivalent) entirely from GFS2?  Does the implementation depend on a
distinction between these on a directory?

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux