On Llu, 2006-04-24 at 14:22 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Record the level vs edge-triggered status of IRQ to allow for error checks later. > > Note: this is only done fir i386/x86_64. This doesn't work for IRQ's routed via the EISA IRQ routing or for MCA that I can see. It also seems to assume the chip state at boot is right. For EISA you need to real the EISA irq register to see what is level and what is edge (and work out what is EISA), for MCA it is board dependant. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC 1/2] irq: record edge-level setting
- From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 1/2] irq: record edge-level setting
- References:
- better leve triggered IRQ management needed
- From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [RFC 1/2] irq: record edge-level setting
- From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- better leve triggered IRQ management needed
- Prev by Date: Re: C++ pushback
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC 1/2] irq: record edge-level setting
- Previous by thread: [RFC 1/2] irq: record edge-level setting
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC 1/2] irq: record edge-level setting
- Index(es):