Re: C++ pushback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:02:27PM -0600, Gary Poppitz wrote:
> >We know they are "incompatible", why else would we allow "private" and
> >"struct class" in the kernel source if we some how expected it to work
> >with a C++ compiler?
> I can see that this was intentional, not an oversight.
> If there is a childish temper tantrum mentality about C++ then I have  
> no reason or desire to be on this list.

If there is a lack of willingness to do a simple bit of research:
The responses you get back might seem a big harsh.

In short, the rule around here, as well with most groups in life, seems
to be:
	"show no respect, get none in return"


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux