On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> [Which tree should I be trying to submit this to? The patch is against
> and works fine with 2.6.17-rc2]
I prefer the following PM defines, so there is only
one block of CONFIG_PM
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
int foo_suspend(...)
{
}
int foo_resume(...)
{
}
#else
#define foo_suspend NULL
#define foo_resume NULL
#endif
> +static struct platform_driver foo_driver = {
> + .probe = foo_probe,
> + .remove = foo_remove,
> + .suspend = foo_suspend,
> + .resume = foo_resume,
> +};
--
Ben ([email protected], http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
