Andrew wrote:
> (btw, using the term "class" to identify a group of tasks isn't very
> comfortable - it's an instance, not a class...)
Bless you. I objected to the term 'class' a long time ago, but failed
to advance my case in a successful fashion.
Matt replied:
> "resource group"?
Nice.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- References:
- [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- Prev by Date: Re: Van Jacobson's net channels and real-time
- Next by Date: Re: usbkbd not reporting unknown keys
- Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- Index(es):
 |