On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 19:13 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: <snip> (I'll let those more familiar with the memory controller efforts comment on those concerns) > (btw, using the term "class" to identify a group of tasks isn't very > comfortable - it's an instance, not a class...) Yes, I can see how this would be uncomfortable. How about replacing "class" with "resource group"? Cheers, -Matt Helsley - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- References:
- [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- Prev by Date: Re: usbkbd not reporting unknown keys
- Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul
- Index(es):
 |