Re: [PATCH] Shrink rbtree

[Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de>]

Hi David,

On Saturday, 22. April 2006 03:29, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 18:09 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > #define HRTIMER_INACTIVE        ((void *)1UL) 
> 
> Ah. That's newer than the kernel I tested on. Your patch isn't going to
> make kernel/hrtimer.c compile though, surely? Let's do it the same way
> everyone else marks off-tree nodes -- by setting its parent pointer to
> point to itself....

Yes, but please make it a common helper, since there is a real need
for it and code has to agree on the dirty hacks it uses :-)

static inline int rb_in_tree(const struct rb_node *node)
{
	return rb_parent(node) != node;
}

static inline void rb_set_off_tree(struct rb_node *node)
{
	rb_set_parent(node, node);
}


This is trivial, but gives semantics to those strange operations.


Regards

Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/