On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 01:03:03PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 11:33 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > My thirst thought is:
> > Is this really the best approach, or could this be done better?
>
> I think it's the best way to start, although I agree with you entirely
> about what we should strive for in the end.
>
> > I'm currently more a fan of a separate kabi/ subdir with headers used by
> > both headers under linux/ and userspace.
>
> I agree -- I'd like to see that too. But Linus doesn't like that
> approach very much.
Thats bacause the kabi subdir is broken by design.
Any approach that does not take into account the existing userbase is
broken by design and should be avoided.
The only sensible solution is to move out the kernel internal headers
from include/* to somewhere else.
And then slowly but steady let include/linux and include/asm-* be the
KABI.
In this way we avoid breaking a lot of current users. And new users will
continue to just work.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
