On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 15:53 -0700, Hua Zhong wrote:
> > struct likeliness {
> > char *file;
> > int line;
> > atomic_t true_count;
> > atomic_t false_count;
> > struct likeliness *next;
> > };
>
> It seems including atomic.h inside compiler.h is a bit tricky (might have interdependency).
>
> Can we just live with int instead of atomic_t? We don't really care about losing a count occasionally..
It's nice so you don't have to fool around with locking .. The atomic_t
structure is pretty simple thought . I think it boils down to just an
int anyway .
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
