On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 22:07 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 07:49 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 19:24 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > > > CKRM has gone through a major overhaul by removing some of the
> > > > complexity, cutting down on features and moving portions to userspace.
> > >
> > > What do you want done with these patches? Do you think they are ready
> > > for mainline? -mm? Or, are you just posting here for comments?
> >
> > We think it is ready for -mm. But, want to go through a review cycle in
> > lkml before i request Andrew for that.
>
> IMHO, it would be a good idea to decouple the current implementation and
> reconnect them via an open mapper/wrapper to allow a more flexible/open
> approach to resource management, which may ease its transition into
> mainline, due to a step-by-step instead of an all-or-none approach.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Al
Hi Al,
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're suggesting. Could you please
elaborate on how you think it should be decoupled?
Thanks,
-Matt Helsley
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
