On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 01:06 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> This patch fixes the build breakage of X86_NUMAQ. And this declares
> xquad_portio on only X86_NUMAQ.
What bug does this patch fix? What is your .config? I'm not having any
compile problems on my NUMAQ lately.
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT) += direct.o
>
> pci-y := fixup.o
> -pci-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += acpi.o
> pci-y += legacy.o irq.o
>
> pci-$(CONFIG_X86_VISWS) := visws.o fixup.o
> pci-$(CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ) := numa.o irq.o
>
> +pci-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += acpi.o
Am I reading this wrong, or does this just move the option down a bit?
Did you need to change the link order? Why?
> +++ linux-2.6-hirofumi/arch/i386/boot/compressed/misc.c 2006-04-22 00:54:29.000000000 +0900
> @@ -122,7 +122,9 @@ static int vidport;
> static int lines, cols;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
> -static void * xquad_portio = NULL;
> +/* hack to avoid using xquad_portio=NULL */
> +#undef outb_p
> +#define outb_p outb_local_p
> #endif
It's really weird, but I'd hope that there was a reason for having two
xquad_portio. Are you sure that this has no other consequences?
That said, it does boot on my 16-way NUMAQ, but I still have no real
idea what problem this is solving or what it is actually doing ;)
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
