On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 10:19:43PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> No matter whether LSM will stay or not, there's no reason to include a
> sample module in the build (e.g. Debian kernels are currently shipping
> this module).
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
As much as I'd like to agree with this (SuSE also ships this module for
some odd reason), I do have reports of people using it for their
machines at times.
So, I'd like to keep this in the tree, for as long as the LSM interface
sticks around, if possible. It's not hurting anything, and it does work
for users, and is a good example starting point for people wanting to
use the LSM interface.
Unless there are any known security problems with it? If so, please let
me know.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
