On Friday 21 April 2006 15:14, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> + [__NR_syscalls] = NULL,
>
> > };
> >
> >- if (s->nr_ret >= __NR_syscalls) {
> >+ if (s->nr_ret >= ARRAY_SIZE(spu_syscall_table)) {
>
> + if(syscall == NULL) {
>
>
>
> That way, syscalls could be added in the master table while spu does not
> break. Comments?
Hmm, my idea was not having to check for NULL pointers when we know
that they are valid function calls. But you are right that your approach
is more robust. It also means that we might just leave out all
the assignments to sys_ni_syscall in order to make the source a little
shorter.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
