Re: [(take 2)patch 6/7] Kprobes registers for notify page fault

[Keshavamurthy Anil S <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>]

On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 10:14:04AM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> Anil S Keshavamurthy (on Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:25:02 -0700) wrote:
> >---
> >@@ -654,6 +659,9 @@ static int __init init_kprobes(void)
> > 	if (!err)
> > 		err = register_die_notifier(&kprobe_exceptions_nb);
> > 
> >+	if (!err)
> >+		err = register_page_fault_notifier(&kprobe_page_fault_nb);
> >+
> > 	return err;
> > }
> > 
> 
> The rest of the patches look OK, but this one does not.  init_kprobes()
> registers the main kprobe exception handler, not the page fault
> handler.
I am registering for register_page_fault_notifier() and as you can see
I am not deleting the old register_die_notifier() which is also required
for getting notified on int3/break and single-step traps. 
So no issues here.

> 
> Now that there is a dedicated page fault handler, instead of being a
> subcase of notify_die(), it might be better to delete DIE_PAGE_FAULT
> completely.  That can be done in this patch set or in some follow on
> patches.
It can be done as a follow up (cleanup patch) and if you see the whole
whole DIE_XXXX is grossly missnamed. I did not want to address two many
things in one patch.

thanks,
-Anil Keshavamurthy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/