Quoting Tony Jones ([email protected]):
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:21:28AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> > Tony, do you have any performance measurements? Both for unconfined and
> > confined apps? Presumably unconfined processes should have 0 performance
> > hit, right?
>
> Hi Serge.
>
> We have lmbench results. We had issues getting reproducability out of dbench
> but need to look at it some more. The lmbench figures we presently have are
> from the old code (reader writer lock). Results were good but we recently
> converted to rcu for the reader dominated rw locks.
>
> I'm not sure there is "0 performance hit for unconfined" as you have to check
> for them being unconfined :) but it's low.
>
> If you have other benchmarks we are open to suggestions. What has been used
> to benchmark SELinux?
I typically use dbench, reaim, tbench, and kernbench, running each 20
times.
> Anyways, we need to regenerate the results, we'll try and post in the next
> couple days. ok?
Cool, thanks.
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
