On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 06:04:19PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > p.s.: I also see that your patch doesn't include on to export d_path so > couldn't actually use it anyway. Not that a patch to export it would ever > be ACKed for above reasons.. Don't understand. Are you saying there is no EXPORT_SYMBOL for d_path? I didn't add one as I didn't remove the old one. It's still there. Thanks Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/11] security: AppArmor - Add flags to d_path
- From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/11] security: AppArmor - Add flags to d_path
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- From: Tony Jones <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 10/11] security: AppArmor - Add flags to d_path
- From: Tony Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/11] security: AppArmor - Add flags to d_path
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/11] security: AppArmor - Add flags to d_path
- From: Tony Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/11] security: AppArmor - Add flags to d_path
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/11] security: AppArmor - Add flags to d_path
- From: Tony Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/11] security: AppArmor - Add flags to d_path
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Netlink and user-space buffer pointers
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Netlink and user-space buffer pointers
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/11] security: AppArmor - Add flags to d_path
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/11] security: AppArmor - Add flags to d_path
- Index(es):
 |