On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:00:37AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Tony, would AppArmor have problems if we don't export that variable > anymore? I don't believe so. We are just a user of register_security and we don't poke around the exported symbol. I guess I'll defer full judgement till I see the actual patch but based on the 10,000' it seems reasonable to me. Anyways, it seems like for the immediate you're just looking at tagging it EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL which sounds fine too. I need to make you a t-shirt with that on it :) Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
- From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
- Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
- From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
- From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
- Removing EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_ops) (was Re: Time to remove LSM)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] smpnice: don't consider sched groups which are lightly loaded for balancing
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] make security_ops EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
- Next by thread: Re: Removing EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_ops) (was Re: Time to remove LSM)
- Index(es):
 |