Quoting grundig ([email protected]):
> El Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:32:30 -0700,
> Crispin Cowan <[email protected]> escribi?:
>
> > Our controls on changing the name space have rather poor granularity at
> > the moment. We hope to improve that over time, and especially if LSM
> > evolves to permit it. This is ok, because as Andi pointed out, there are
> > currently few applications using name spaces, so we have time to improve
> > the granularity.
>
> Wouldn't have more sense to improve it and then submit it instead of the
> contrary? At least is the rule which AFAIK is applied to every feature
> going in the kernel, specially when there's an available alternative
> which users can use meanwhile (see reiser4...)
hah, that's funny
When people do that, they are rebuked for not submitting upstream. At
least this way, we can have a discussion about whether the approach
makes sense at all.
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
