On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:08:39PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:12:13 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 18 April 2006 21:05, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:35:22PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
> > > >...
> > >
> > > NAK.
> > > submitting a patch that is the revert of a patch that went
> > > into Linus' tree just 8 days ago [1], I'd expect at least:
> > > - a Cc to the people involved with the patch you are reverting
> > > - a note that you are reverting a recent patch in your patch
> > > description
> > > - an explanation why you disagree with the patch you are reverting
> >
> > The subject was very clear. i386 options belong into arch/i386.
>
> Yes, the timing could have been better. Whatever.
>
> I agree with Andi that it should be moved back to the ix86 Processor
> menu, but not where he moved it to. My patch is below.
>...
I'd still disagree with Andi regarding this point (but it's not a very
important issue).
My main problem with his patch is still the way he did it - sending a
patch reverting a recently included patch with neither discussion before
the patch nor mentioning in the patch that it's a revert nor a Cc to the
people involved with the patch.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
