On 4/19/06, Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17.04.2006 04:30, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > No replies to this patch (below) at all, despite lots of people and
> > lists on CC :-(
> > Ohh well, adding akpm to CC so that perhaps the patch can make it into
> > -mm and at least get some testing.
>
> Yeah, apparently nobody wants to put much work into i4l anymore.
So it would seem.
> Everybody's waiting for it to be replaced by CAPI, only we don't quite
> seem to be there yet.
>
I don't know the state of that, but as long as the i4l stuff is in the
kernel I think we should try to fix bugs when we find them, so I'll
just try to push the patch again in a while.
> Anyway, my development machine has been running with your patch for a
> while, with no apparent ill effects. Although this hardly qualifies as
> exhaustive testing, it does seem do indicate that the patch is on the
> right track.
>
Thanks a lot for trying the patch and your feedback, I really appreciate it.
--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
