Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)

["Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>]

Quoting Greg KH (greg@kroah.com):
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:22:07PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > In general: I am probably too strongly tied to my own CodingStyle to
> > change it for Documentation/CodingStyle.
> 
> There's a very good reason the kernel has a consistant coding style, so
> if you don't want to adapt to it, do not expect to ever get your code
> accepted, it's that simple.
> 
> Sorry to hear that such a trivial thing is going to trip you up.

Greg,

I think what really tripped him up was the response to his attempt
to get the new hooks introduced:  tinyurl.com/opo8h

Jan,

I think that the last response, by Chrisw, in that thread, was not
a snide comment, but a legitimate request for a justification for
the hooks.  If they are a crucial part of your module, then i assume
they should be pretty easy for you to defend, right?

I think it would be worth trying again.

-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/