Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:16:46 +0200, Jan Engelhardt said:

> >So, I think the only way to be able to realisticly keep the LSM
> >interface, is for a valid, working, maintained LSM-based security model
> >to go into the kernel tree.  So far, I haven't seen any public posting
> >of patches that meet this requirement :(
> 
> In that case, maybe it would be worthwhile to flip the positions, i.e. LSM on
> top of SELinux, sort of a compat layer.

How would that *possibly* work?  What semantics would *that* have?

Attachment: pgpAIKjxmNmuu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux