Op woensdag 19 april 2006 10:37, schreef Andreas Mohr: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:08:08AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > On Monday 17 April 2006 04:44, Andreas Mohr wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 09:22:59AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > > The current value, 6ms at 1000HZ, is chosen because it's the largest > > > > value that can schedule a task in less than normal human perceptible > > > > range when two competing heavily cpu bound tasks are the same > > > > priority. At 250HZ it works out to 7.5ms and 10ms at 100HZ. > > > > Ironically in my experimenting I found the cpu cache improvements > > > > become much less significant above 7ms so I'm very happy with this > > > > compromise. > > > > > > Heh, this part is *EXACTLY* a fully sufficient explanation of what I > > > was wondering about myself just these days ;) > > > (I'm experimenting with different timeslice values on my P3/450 to > > > verify what performance impact exactly it has) > > > However with a measly 256kB cache it probably doesn't matter too much, > > > I think. > > > > > > But I think it's still important to mention that your perception might > > > be twisted by your P4 limitation (no testing with slower and really > > > slow machines). > > > > You underestimate me. Those cpu cache effects were performance effects > > measured down to a PII 233, but all were i386 architecture. As for > > "perception" this isn't my testing I'm talking about; these are > > neuropsychiatric tests that have nothing to do with pcs or what processor > > you use ;) > > OK, but I was not worrying about the interactivity aspects, rather the > performance aspects (GUI updates of KDE 3.5.2 on P3/450/256MB on Ubuntu are > about as slow as medium-hot lava). While of course it's mostly KDE (and > probably also the S3 Savage driver/card) which is to blame here, > I'm trying to first do as much as possible at kernel level before > eventually going higher up the chain... if it's slow redrawing, i'd blame the video driver or X, not KDE/Qt - tough you might want to try another style and windowdecoration. plastik is generally speaking quite fast, or try the 'light' style. Xorg xcomposite might help too, but i guess your video card won't like that :D slow app startup will be better in Kubuntu Dapper+1, as they will finally incorporate the new fontconfig (*g* i hope so) and use GCC's C++ symbol invisibillity in KDE/Qt. those both can give speedups in the area of 10-20%, so that should be noticable. KDE 3.5.3 also will also have a few other patches to speed up the KDE startup process, so - faster login, too. now with al this, its hard to imagine KDE 4 will again sport some 20/30% speedup due to reduced memory usage/binary size ;-) > Andreas
Attachment:
pgp2UXYJ0QmIr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [ck] Re: [patch][rfc] quell interactive feeding frenzy
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: [patch][rfc] quell interactive feeding frenzy
- From: Andreas Mohr <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: [patch][rfc] quell interactive feeding frenzy
- Prev by Date: Re: is this GPL v2 violation - konica-minolta or EFI ?
- Next by Date: Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
- Previous by thread: Re: [ck] Re: [patch][rfc] quell interactive feeding frenzy
- Next by thread: Re: [ck] Re: [patch][rfc] quell interactive feeding frenzy
- Index(es):