Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups

On 04/14/2006 06:26 AM, David S. Miller wrote:
> These interfaces were added so that new users of netlink could
> write their code more easily.
>
> Unused does not equate to "comment out or delete".

Does a GENETLINK Kconfig option make sense (possibly dependant on
EMBEDDED)?  I'm unsure whether these interfaces are going to be used
in core networking code that can't be disabled anyway.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] binary firmware and modules
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups
• Next by thread: [PATCH 0/4] Cleanup of mtd->type and mtd->flags
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]