Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups

On Maw, 2006-04-18 at 16:19 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> OTOH, we also have to always check whether users are expected soon (and 
> recheck whether there are really users after some time) since every 
> single export makes the kernel larger for nearly everyone.

Of course fixing the amount of memory used by an EXPORT_SYMBOL would be
far more productive.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: MSI failure on Nvidia nForce
• Next by Date: Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]