Re: [GIT PATCH] Fixes in the -stable tree, but not in mainline

On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:29:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Here are 5 patches that are in the -stable tree, yet not currently fixed
> in your mainline tree.  One of them is a security fix, so it probably
> would be a good idea to get it into there :)

I thought one of the requirements for accepting a patch into -stable
was that it was already in mainline.  Was this a change in policy that
I missed, or just an oversight when we vetted these patches?

Not that I have anything against these patches, just curious in the
future if we should NACK patches proposed for -stable if we notice
that they aren't yet in mainline.

						- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GIT PATCH] Fixes in the -stable tree, but not in mainline
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

References:
- [GIT PATCH] Fixes in the -stable tree, but not in mainline
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Question on Schedule and Preemption
Next by Date: Re: irqbalance mandatory on SMP kernels?
Previous by thread: [PATCH 5/5] shmat: stop mprotect from giving write permission to a readonly attachment (CVE-2006-1524)
Next by thread: Re: [GIT PATCH] Fixes in the -stable tree, but not in mainline
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]