Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks

On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Kazuki Omo(Company) wrote:

> This is my first post. My name is OMO, member of LIDS development team.
> (LIDS is not IDS. I think the name sometime will cause
>  misunderstanding.)
> 
> Actually, LIDS is using LSM Framework from kernel-2.6.0 and
> keeps developing new one.
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-security-module&m=113472048023966&w=2


This is out of tree code, and thus typically not considered in the 
mainline development process.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
    • From: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
    • From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
    • From: "Kazuki Omo(Company)" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] binary firmware and modules
• Previous by thread: Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
• Next by thread: Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]