Re: RT question : softirq and minimal user RT priority

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Hounschell wrote:

> 
> The default IRQ threads seem to be at RT priorities 25-49. So a user
> should never have a RT compute bound task at a RT priority higher than
> 25? Doesn't seem quite right. In any case, I have other less compute
> bound lower priority RT tasks also running on the same CPU so my high
> priority RT task must be giving up the CPU somewhere along the line. Why
> is it not able to receive signals? Something is not quite right here.
> 
> Regards
> Mark
> 

Actually those other tasks are on another CPU. Sorry. I still think
something is amiss here?

Mark
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux