On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 08:11 +0200, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> So I misunderstood preempt_max_latency. I thought it to be absolute
> time, but it actually is codepath cycles, translated to microseconds
> using the current CPU frequency. Thanks for clarifying.
They are one and the same. At 800Mhz the same code patch causes twice
the latency.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
