Re: [RFC] binary firmware and modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Arjan,

> > > compiled drivers need their firmware, too. Secondly, do all drivers
> > > know at compile time which firmware they'll need?
> > 
> > They have to know what they will request, do they not?
> 
> in order to not fall in the naming-policy trap: do we need a translation
> layer here? eg the module asks for firmware-<modulename>
> and userspace then somehow maps that to a full filename via a lookup
> table?

why do we need that? Currently it is not needed and I don't see a reason
to make it more complicated.

The important thing is to export the used firmware names to the
userspace, because this piece of information is only stored inside the
kernel source code right now.

Regards

Marcel


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux