Re: [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>]

Am Monday 17 April 2006 02:45 schrieb Steven Rostedt:
> > - does not work in real mode, so percpu data can't be used
> >   inside exception handlers on some architectures.
>
> This is probably a big issue.  I believe interrupt context in hrtimers
> uses per_cpu variables.

If it's just about hrtimers, it should be harmless, since they
are run in softirq context. Even regular interrupt handlers are
always called with paging enabled, otherwise you could not
have them im modules.

> > - memory consumption is rather high when PAGE_SIZE is large
>
> That's also something that I'm trying to solve.  To use the least amount
> of memory and still have the performance.
>
> Now, I've also thought about allocating per_cpu and when a module is
> loaded, reallocate more memory and copy it again.  Use something like
> the kstopmachine to sync the system so that the CPUS don't update any
> per_cpu variables while this is happening, so that things can't get out
> of sync.

I guess this breaks if someone holds a pointer to a per-cpu variable
while a module gets loaded.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/