I'm seeing a lot of LTP failures in current kernels. Is this just LTP
being horribly broken? Or are mailine kernels broken?
I've never been keen on it's "expected failure" model, but this does
seem to be excessive. Get very similar failures from -mm and mainline.
2.6.17-rc1-mm2:
http://test.kernel.org/abat/27722/001.ltp.test/results/ltp.failures
2.6.17-rc1-git9:
http://test.kernel.org/abat/28423/001.ltp.test/results/ltp.failures
accept01 1 FAIL : bad file descriptor ; returned -454050240
(expected -1), errno 0 (expected 9)
capset02 4 BROK : Unexpected signal 15 received.
clone06 0 WARN : sprintf() failed
clone06 1 BROK : Unexpected signal 11 received.
connect01 1 FAIL : bad file descriptor ; returned -435334536
(expected -1), errno 0 (expected 9)
dup06 1 FAIL : Not enough files duped
dup06 2 FAIL : Test failed.
fcntl23 1 FAIL : fcntl(tfile_15730, F_SETLEASE,F_RDLCK) Failed,
errno=11 : Resource temporarily unavailable
getdtablesize01 2 FAIL : 0 != 1023
getpeername01 1 FAIL : bad file descriptor ; returned -1209263248
(expected -1), errno 0 (expected 9)
getsockname01 1 FAIL : bad file descriptor ; returned -1209283664
(expected -1), errno 0 (expected 9)
getsockopt01 1 FAIL : bad file descriptor ; returned -457777152
(expected -1), errno 0 (expected 9)
ioperm02 1 FAIL : Unexpected results for Invalid I/O address ;
returned 0 (expected -1), errno 0 (expected errno 22)
kill05 0 INFO : WARNING: shared memory deletion failed.
listen01 1 FAIL : bad file descriptor ; returned 0 (expected -1),
errno 0 (expected 9)
mlockall02 1 CONF : mlockall02 did not FAIL as expected.This may
be okay if you are running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (RHEL)
mlockall02 2 CONF : mlockall02 did not FAIL as expected.This may
be okay if you are running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (RHEL)
mincore01 4 FAIL : call succeeded unexpectedly
recvmsg01 1 FAIL : bad file descriptor ; returned -1056444352
(expected -1), errno 0 (expected 9)
sendmsg01 1 FAIL : bad file descriptor ; returned -1 (expected
-1), errno 14 (expected 9)
setitimer01 1 FAIL : old timer value is not equal to expected value
setregid02 7 FAIL : setregid(65535, -1) failed (1) but did not set
the expected errno (22).
setregid02 8 FAIL : setregid(-1, 65535) failed (1) but did not set
the expected errno (22).
setsockopt01 1 FAIL : bad file descriptor ; returned 13 (expected
-1), errno 0 (expected 9)
socket01 4 FAIL : raw open as non-root ; returned -1 (expected
-1), errno 93 (expected 94)
socket01 6 FAIL : UDP stream ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
(expected 94)
socket01 7 FAIL : TCP dgram ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 93
(expected 94)
socket01 9 FAIL : ICMP stream ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno
93 (expected 94)
socketpair01 4 FAIL : raw open as non-root ; returned -1 (expected
-1), errno 93 (expected 94)
socketpair01 8 FAIL : TCP dgram ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno
93 (expected 94)
socketpair01 10 FAIL : ICMP stream ; returned -1 (expected -1),
errno 93 (expected 94)
writev03 1 FAIL : Got error EFAULT
writev03 0 INFO : block 1 FAILED
writev03 2 FAIL : Got error EFAULT
writev03 0 INFO : block 2 FAILED
writev03 3 FAIL : Got error EFAULT
writev03 0 INFO : block 3 FAILED
writev04 1 FAIL : Got error EFAULT
writev04 0 INFO : block 1 FAILED
writev04 2 FAIL : Got error EFAULT
writev04 0 INFO : block 2 FAILED
writev04 3 FAIL : Got error EFAULT
writev04 0 INFO : block 3 FAILED
INFO: pan reported some tests FAIL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
