Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:17:04 +1000
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <20060412232036.18862.84118.sendpatchset@skynet>
Organization: Cyclades Corporation
References: <20060412232036.18862.84118.sendpatchset@skynet>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1

Hi Mel.

It looks to me like this code could be used by the software suspend code in 
our determinations of what pages to save, particularly in the context of 
memory hotplug support. Just some food for thought at the moment; I'll see if 
I can come up with a patch when I have some time, but it might help justify 
getting this merged.

Regards,

Nigel

Attachment: pgpGmUZ9JIzi9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
  - From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
  - From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: RE: [patch 1/3] acpi: dock driver
Next by Date: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Behaviour change of /dev/fb0?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux