On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 04:09:38PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
I tried to reproduce the old bug but I failed, no matter how many
patches I backout. However this isn't the -stable that was advertised
initially if patches like this are merged, given that it's unclear if
the old deadlock will come back or not. If I got an answer within a week
and not with a delay of half year after I posted the fix for the
deadlock we would be in a better shape, since perhaps I could still
reproduce it somehow (I could reproduce it in a reasonable amount of
time half an year ago). It's possible that scheduling and userland
changes may have hidden the deadlock (the deadlock requires buggy
userland and a sigsegv in gdb to reproduce, so if gdb is doing any
better that could be hidding it). It's also possible that the bug was
fixed in some other way, so I will try again after going back to the sp3
codebase that shouldn't have changed *that* much.
All details are in https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=115754
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
