Re: select takes too much time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Of course you can't get lower resolution than 1/HZ, unless you're using
> a kernel with high-res timers. It's always been like that.
> But it's not Ram's problem, because he's requesting a timeout of 90ms,
> which is much longer than one tick even with HZ=100.
>
> Michal
>

So it seems that the only solution to return back right away after
timeout is to play around with the scheduler or put the process doing
select at the front of the queue so it get a chance to run first.
Is there any other better way to do it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux