Re: [PATCH 5/5] Swapless V2: Revise main migration logic

On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

> For hotremove (I stops it now..), we should fix this later (if we can do).
> If new SWP_TYPE_MIGRATION swp entry can contain write protect bit,
> hotremove can avoid copy-on-write but things will be more complicated.

This is a known issue.I'd be glad if you could come up with a working 
scheme to solve this that is simple.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 5/5] Swapless V2: Revise main migration logic
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 5/5] Swapless V2: Revise main migration logic
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/5] Swapless page migration V2: Overview
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 5/5] Swapless V2: Revise main migration logic
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 5/5] Swapless V2: Revise main migration logic
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: notifier chain problem? (was Re: 2.6.17-rc1 did break XFS)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Swapless V2: Revise main migration logic
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Swapless V2: Revise main migration logic
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Swapless V2: Revise main migration logic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]