Re: [PATCH] Kmod optimization

[email protected] wrote:

+/* Test if a module is loaded : must hold module_mutex */
+inline int is_loaded(const char *module_name)
+{
+	struct module *mod = find_module(module_name);
+
+	if (!mod)
+		return 1;

FWIW, this logic seems reversed....

--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com

Pointy-Haired Boss: I don't see anything that could stand in our way.
           Dilbert: Sanity? Reality? The laws of physics?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Kmod optimization
    • From: <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Kmod optimization
    • From: <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Kmod optimization
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Kmod optimization
    • From: <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Kmod optimization
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Kmod optimization
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Kmod optimization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]