On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 19:53 +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 04:21:18PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Looks strange, the faulting address is in the same region as the
> > >> eip. I am not that strong on x86 layouts, so I am not sure whether
> > >> 0x78xxxxxx is the kernel's mapping or it's module space. Almost looks
> > >> like something else had registered a notifier and then gone away
> > >> without unregistering it.
> > >
> > >sorry, the essential data I didn't provide here is
> > >probably that I configured the 2G/2G split, which for
> > >unknown reasons actually is a 2.125/1.875 split and
> > >starts at 0x78000000 (instead of 0x80000000)
> >
> > That's how it is coded in arch/i386/Kconfig. It says 78 rather than 80.
> > Maybe Con has an idea?
>
> here is the same oops with 3/1 split and the bootup log
>
Hi Herbert,
Looks to be the same stack as earlier, Is there any modules compiled in
that were removed before you tried to mount the XFS filesystem ?
Can you send me the .config file.
chandra
<snip>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- [email protected] | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
