Re: notifier chain problem? (was Re: 2.6.17-rc1 did break XFS)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 14 April 2006 00:21, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >> Looks strange, the faulting address is in the same region as the
> >> eip. I am not that strong on x86 layouts, so I am not sure whether
> >> 0x78xxxxxx is the kernel's mapping or it's module space. Almost looks
> >> like something else had registered a notifier and then gone away
> >> without unregistering it.
> >
> >sorry, the essential data I didn't provide here is
> >probably that I configured the 2G/2G split, which for
> >unknown reasons actually is a 2.125/1.875 split and
> >starts at 0x78000000 (instead of 0x80000000)
>
> That's how it is coded in arch/i386/Kconfig. It says 78 rather than 80.
> Maybe Con has an idea?

Follow this thread backwards from this point:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113690295909937&w=2

-- 
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux