Re: [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16)

On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 18:53 +0200, Gunther Mayer wrote:

> >
> Can you name the exact 8250 model which is buggy ?
> 

>From the spec:

COM1 und COM2 werden mittels der Ultra IO FDC37C675 implementiert. COM3
und COM4 sind 16C550 oder kompatible.


I'm using COM1 and COM2 so it's the Ultra IO FDC37C675.

-- Steve


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16)
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16)
  - From: Gunther Mayer <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.17 regression: Very slow net transfer from some hosts
Next by Date: Re: scx200_acb: Use PCI I/O resource when appropriate
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]