Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Does that look OK?
>
> No this is not ok because in several of these cases the response to the
> command is longer than tpm_cap thus the reason for the hardcoded size.
OK.
> I can put in a max function though that compares the size of the
> response and the tpm_cap. The read functions will make sure the
> response does not overflow the buffer should that length ever change in
> the future.
Well, pretty much anything which will automatically increase the size of
that array in response to changing data structures would suit, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
