Re: [patch] do_no_pfn handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> You mentioned earlier that you preferred an alternative approach, do
> you still feel that given the additional interest from other Bjorn and
> Carsten? If this is still the case, I'd love to get some guidance as
> to what that should be.

I'm still pretty unhappy with this. It's pretty much designed to screw up 
the system by letting the driver do random things that make little or no 
sense from a VM standpoint.


	BUG_ON(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP));

certainly helps, but it still leaves the window open for other problems. 

At the very least, it would also need a


(or at least make it return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS). Because a COW mapping _will_ 
confuse the VM and cause it to do random bad things in vm_normal_page(). 

It also assumes that a negative pfn is ok as an error return, but maybe 
that's fine. I can't think of any architecture that uses all bits of the 
PFN (x86 with PAE can have a full 32-bit PFN, but I don't think any actual 
CPU supports 48 bits of physical addressing?). Something to think about.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux